Could we actually refreeze the Arctic, or is that just wishful thinking dressed up as science?
When politicians keep failing to agree on climate action, who gets to decide that humans should start engineering the planet instead?
If a solution is technically possible but costs an almost unimaginable amount of money, at what point does «worth it» stop being a financial question?
What happens to the rest of the world the moment the last Arctic ice disappears, and why does that matter to someone sitting in an office in Buenos Aires or Madrid?
Between doing nothing and intervening directly in a natural system, is there actually a middle ground, or is that just a comfortable illusion?
For our Watch & Talk sessions, this video sparks discussion around climate action and responsibility, cost versus consequence, scientific solutions versus political will, and the language of comparison and problem-solving.
Ready to watch and find out where you stand?
Watch the video here (but it’s always more interesting to talk about it 😉):
