If a self-driving car has to choose between hitting one person or five, who actually gets to program that decision?
Does the value of a human life change depending on age, health, or whether someone is behind the wheel or crossing the street?
If you knew a self-driving car might sacrifice you to save others, would you still buy one?
Should the company that writes the code be legally responsible for who lives and who dies?
Is it even possible to turn a moral philosophy question into an algorithm, or are we just pretending it is?
For our Watch & Talk sessions, this video sparks discussion around autonomous technology, corporate ethics, legal liability, and human decision-making.
Ready to find out what the video says? So are we.
Watch the video here (but it’s always more interesting to talk about it 😉):
