If someone is drowning on one side of a bridge and you are standing on the other side, what is the one thing that changes whether you are morally obligated to help?
Does physical distance actually change how responsible you are for someone else’s suffering, or does it just change how comfortable you feel about ignoring it?
If you could save five strangers by sacrificing one, is that mathematics or murder?
When you instinctively say «that’s different» to two situations that look identical on paper, what exactly are you protecting?
Is the way you make ethical decisions at work actually consistent, or do you just tell yourself it is?
For our Watch & Talk sessions, this video sparks discussion around ethical reasoning, decision-making under pressure, moral consistency, and critical thinking.
Book your session and find out where your logic actually breaks down.
Watch the video here (but it’s always more interesting to talk about it 😉):
