Can a city rebrand its most controversial neighborhood without erasing what made it famous in the first place?
What is the difference between reducing tourism and simply relocating a problem?
If a city government commissions a building to improve workers’ conditions, does that make it a social project or a real estate play?
At what point does «elegant and multifunctional» become a polite way of saying «we want a different kind of visitor»?
For our Watch & Talk sessions, this video sparks discussion around urban planning, ethics in policy-making, stakeholder conflict, and city branding.
Watch the video here (but it’s always more interesting to talk about it 😉):
